| Chandigarh | Punjab | Haryana | Total | ||||

Name of the company | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low |

Pepsodent | 438 | 396 | 420 | 395 | 452.5 | 413.75 | 1310.5 | 1204.75 |

ZARA | 148 | 140 | 189.5 | 180 | 190 | 180 | 527.5 | 500 |

Bagh Bakri Chai | 28 | 22.75 | 28.25 | 23 | 29 | 24.5 | 85.25 | 70.25 |

RCOM | 190.5 | 177 | 189 | 177.5 | 191.25 | 177.5 | 570.75 | 532 |

Birla | 160 | 143 | 158 | 140.5 | 161.25 | 102.5 | 479.25 | 386 |

1. Rs.192.9

2. Rs.202.9

3. Rs.169.9

4. Rs.178

The average for all the high involved with the Chandigarh region was

(438+148+28+190.5+160)/5 which gives 192.9.

(438+148+28+190.5+160)/5 which gives 192.9.

1. 17.75

2. 15.67

3. 15.57

4. None of these

Total value for the low of the Punjab region for the given companies is 395+180+23+177.5+140.5=916 whereas the total for the low of the Haryana region is 413.75+180+24.5+177.5+102.5=898.25. So it exceeds by 916 – 898.25=17.75.

1.98.4%

2.101%

3.106.4%

4. None of these

The total of lows for the RCOM for all the given states/ UT are given to be 532 and the ZARA has the total for their lows to be 500.Thus ATQ (532/500)*100 = 106.4%

1. 50%

2. 44%

3. 40%

4. 55%

High for the company "BIRLA" in Chandigarh was 160 and Total of high in Punjab and Haryana happen to be 319.25.

So, ATQ the percentage required will be (160/319.25)*100=50% approx.

So, ATQ the percentage required will be (160/319.25)*100=50% approx.

1. 260

2. 170

3. 270

4. 280.25

The total of high for all the given places is 2973.25 whereas the low totals to 2693. So the given data differ by 280.25.

Must Read Table Chart Articles

- Quick Review: Graph and its types
- DI Table Charts: Concepts & formulas
- DI Table Chart: Solved Examples

Number of candidates appeared (App.) and percentage of candidates qualified (Qual.) under different disciplines over the years.

Year | German | French | Chinese | Latin | Greek | |||||

| App. | Qual% | App. | Qual% | App. | Qual% | App. | Qual% | App. | Qual% |

2011 | 842 | 29 | 908 | 21 | 1928 | 40 | 579 | 45 | 843 | 42 |

2012 | 1019 | 27 | 878 | 28 | 2028 | 38 | 608 | 38 | 719 | 36 |

2013 | 985 | 31 | 1156 | 31 | 2536 | 42 | 492 | 42 | 645 | 41 |

2014 | 1215 | 28 | 1290 | 32 | 2113 | 45 | 714 | 55 | 720 | 39 |

2015 | 1429 | 34 | 1075 | 24 | 1725 | 36 | 801 | 48 | 586 | 48 |

2016 | 1128 | 24 | 1416 | 35 | 1820 | 39 | 726 | 51 | 620 | 35 |

1. 230

2. 23

3. 40

4. 30

Number of students in the year 2013 were 985 and they increased to 1215, so there was a net increase of 230.Talking of percentage there was an increase of 230 in the initial value 985, so the increase will be (230/985)*100 = 23.35

1. 450

2. 950

3. 650

4. 900

The actual no. of candidates that were qualified under Chinese stream = 45% of 2113 = 950.

1. 2013, 2014

2. 2014, 2015

3. 2012, 2013

4. 2011 & 2016

In the year 2014 i.e. (39% * 720) = 280(approx). For 2015 i.e. (48% * 586) = 281(approx). They are approximately equal.

1. 505

2. 545

3. 530

4. 560

Students who qualified under the stream Greek in 2011 (42% of 843) = 354(approx)

Students who qualified under the stream French in 2011 (21% of 908) = 191(approx)

Total for the years 354+191=545

Students who qualified under the stream French in 2011 (21% of 908) = 191(approx)

Total for the years 354+191=545

1. 2016, 2015

2. 2013, 2016

3. 2016, 2014

4. 2016, 2012

In the year 2013 the number of candidates who were in German = 985. For the year 2016, the total no of candidates in German happens to be = 1128

So Total = 985 + 1128 = 2113. Students who appeared under the Chinese stream in 2014 = 2113

So Total = 985 + 1128 = 2113. Students who appeared under the Chinese stream in 2014 = 2113

Year | A | B | C | D | E | |||||

| Widgets | % Defect | Widgets | % Defect | Widgets | % Defect | Widgets . | % Defect | Widgets | % Defect |

2001 | 76 | 5 | 58 | 11 | 39 | 5 | 59 | 9 | 28 | 8 |

2002 | 82 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 37 | 9 | 62 | 8 | 36 | 4 |

2003 | 65 | 8 | 49 | 8 | 45 | 6 | 47 | 12 | 42 | 15 |

2004 | 70 | 12 | 52 | 12 | 42 | 13 | 54 | 4 | 31 | 9 |

2005 | 85 | 9 | 64 | 14 | 38 | 11 | 57 | 7 | 49 | 11 |

2006 | 80 | 11 | 54 | 10 | 40 | 8 | 68 | 5 | 38 | 7 |

1. B

2. E

3. A

4. D

If we look closely then we will find that the production of factory A happens to be maximum and thus its average will also be highest. We can also verify this by calculating the number of widgets individually and dividing it by the number of given years i.e. 6.

1. 2800

2. 4000

3. 3500

4. 3100

Reqd. No. = (15% of 42000) - (8% of 40000) = 6300 - 3200 = 3100

1. 94%

2. 90%

3. 85%

4. 99%

The total of the widgets that were produced in the year 2002 was 263(Lakhs) and the ones produced in the year 2006 were 280(Lakhs). The percentage value is (263/280) x 100 = 94 % (approx).

**Note:**** **We have taken the total in place of average as the result in both the cases will be same. The reason is in case of average, we have to divide both numerator and denominator by 6 which will not make any difference in final result.

1. 300

2. 150

3. 260

4. 400

Required difference = (87% of 42000) – (92% of 40000) = 36540 – 36800 = -260

So the difference is 260.

So the difference is 260.